| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_migrator issues |
| Date: | 2010-01-07 12:40:00 |
| Message-ID: | 201001071240.o07Ce0V27340@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > On m<C3><A5>n, 2010-01-04 at 13:07 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> Yea, I am not excited about having vacuumdb do only analyze, but it
> > >> seems the most minimal solution. I spelled it --only-analyze and just
> > >> posted the reason and patch.
> >
> > > I can't find the patch and the reason, but note that we already have
> > > other options like --data-only, --schema-only, --tuples-only. I
> > > personally don't like the spelling of --only-analyze.
> >
> > In particular note that pg_dump has options --schema and --schema-only,
> > and nobody has complained about that. I concur with Peter that this
> > spelling is gratuitously unlike everyplace else.
>
> Oh, interesting about pg_dump. Let's just go with --analyze-only.
> --only-analyze is feeling odd to me too.
Done, attached and applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| /rtmp/diff | text/x-diff | 10.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-01-07 12:44:43 | Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication) |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-01-07 12:39:41 | Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication) |