From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication) |
Date: | 2010-01-06 14:02:41 |
Message-ID: | 20100106140241.GB6129@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao escribió:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> >> I don't see the use case for it - .pgpass is for single users, not a whole
> >> cluster. And it does support wildcards, which takes care of the 'all' case.
> >> In the case of pg_hba.conf we don't know in advance who will actually be
> >> connecting. But in the case of .pgpass we do, so the extra utility of
> >> 'sameuser', 'samerole' and 'samegroup' in this case is not apparent to me.
> >
> > OK, I might need to focus only on the use of replication, without
> > being avaricious.
>
> The attached patch supports new keyword 'replication' on .pgpass file.
> This keyword is used to specify the password for the standby server to
> connect to the primary server.
Would it make more sense to have a separate password file for the
replication stuff? Say .pgreplicationpass or whatever.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-06 14:11:51 | Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication) |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-01-06 13:37:21 | Re: Change Catalog |