| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG SQLDA support |
| Date: | 2010-01-05 16:54:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20100105165412.GB5747@feivel.credativ.lan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:32:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think checking SIZEOF_LONG would be preferred, since that's what
> we use elsewhere. Although actually I wonder why this code exists
> at all --- wouldn't it be easier to make these depend on "int64"?
It does use int64. However, ecpg uses HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT64 to decide whether
it's datatype ECPGt_long_long exists. I changed the patch to use the same
define as usual.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-01-05 17:21:12 | Re: Writeable CTEs |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2010-01-05 16:53:15 | Re: ECPG SQLDA support |