Re: A third lock method

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Once I sort out the subject issue, I'm about ready to try to start
> generating a very rough prototype of predicate locking. I don't want
> to start a discussion of those details on this thread, because it
> seems to me that a decision on the subject issue affects significant
> details about how I go about that.
>
> Consider this the 5,000 foot overview. Previous thread contain much
> more, and references to more authoritative documents.
>
> This is not a small effort. I'll be surprised if it comes in at less
> than 2,000 lines of code, plus documentation and tests. I'm not
> really expecting it to make the next release after 8.5. With some
> luck, maybe the next release after that. And that's all conditional
> on our CIO approving programming time for the effort. I'm currently
> trying to dig in far enough to provide more accurate estimates and
> time lines to facilitate approval.
>
> Hopefully I haven't just scared you off of your offer to help. ;-)

Thanks, I do understand it better now.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +