Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
To: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
Date: 2009-12-19 10:19:12
Message-ID: 200912191019.nBJAJg1I058026@vsmtp3.jaring.my
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 03:19 AM 12/19/2009, David Boreham wrote:
>Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
>>It seems you currently can only control outbound traffic from an
>>interface, so you'd have to set stuff on both interfaces to "shape"
>>upstream and downstream - this is not so convenient in some network topologies.
>This is more a property of the universe than the software ;)

Not really, there is no technical reason that makes it impossible to
have an inbound queue instead of jumping through hoops and creating
virtual interfaces (or even an entire host).

Link.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Filip Rembiałkowski 2009-12-19 11:47:59 Re: Extracting SQL from logs in a usable format
Previous Message Raimon Fernandez 2009-12-19 07:40:12 Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ?