From: | Hiroyuki Yamada <yamada(at)kokolink(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hot Standby and prepared transactions |
Date: | 2009-12-17 10:55:36 |
Message-ID: | 200912171055.AA00174@silver.kokolink.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 19:35 +0900, Hiroyuki Yamada wrote:
>
>> * There is a window beween gathering lock information in GetRunningTransactionLocks()
>> and writing WAL in LogAccessExclusiveLocks().
>> * In current lock redo algorithm, locks are released when the transaction holding the lock
>> are commited or aborted.
>>
>> ... then what happens if any transaction holding ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock commits in the
>> window ?
>
>Yes, was a problem in that code. Fixed in git.
>
>We were doing it for prepared transactions but not for normal xacts.
>I will look again at that code.
>
>Thanks very much for reading the code. Any more?!?
>
Well, I've read some more and have a question.
The implementation assumes that transactions write COMMIT/ABORT WAL at the end
of them, while it does not seem to write ABORT WAL in immediate shutdown. So,
1. acquire ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock in table A in xact 1
2. execute immediate shutdown of the active node
3. restart it
4. acquire ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock in table A in xact 2
...then, duplicate lock acquisition by two diffrent transactions can occur in the standby node.
Am I missing something ? Or is this already reported ?
regards,
--
Hiroyuki YAMADA
Kokolink Corporation
yamada(at)kokolink(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-12-17 11:24:52 | Re: Hot Standby and prepared transactions |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-12-17 10:51:56 | Re: PATCH: Spurious "22" in hstore.sgml |