Re: thread safety on clients

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: thread safety on clients
Date: 2009-12-11 14:36:04
Message-ID: 20091211143604.GC30833@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Jaime Casanova
> <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >>
> >> My bet is that the real problem was a build inconsistency in
> >> the backend.  Does "make distclean" and rebuild make it go away?
> >>
> >
> > actually it was a clean build just after a cvs co (not an updated
> > tree), i build the binaries and installed it in just created
> > directory...
> > i will try again now with the patch Bruce just committed
>
> the problem has gone

Yes, but what if you test with the broken pgbench? As Tom says, it
should not be able to crash the backend no matter what it does.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Smalley 2009-12-11 14:37:44 Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security
Previous Message Joshua Brindle 2009-12-11 14:34:32 Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security