From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Tucker <atucker(at)batchblue(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Question about replication options |
Date: | 2009-12-07 20:35:47 |
Message-ID: | 20091207203547.GN3552@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Adam Tucker wrote:
> I'm interested in having live replication from one server to another, and I've looked into many of the options out there but I'm unclear on one part of it. The way our database works is that each individual user account has their own schema. When a new user signs up, a new schema is created and populated with basic data.
>
> Slony-I seemed like a good option, but in the documentation it states that it "does not automatically propagate schema changes." Our schemas don't change after creation, but I am guessing that adding a schema to the database falls under the definition of "schema changes."
>
> Am I wrong about that limitation of Slony-I, and if not does anyone here have a recommendation for a replication solution that would work for my situation?
You are wrong. It means you cannot simply alter a replicated table on
the origin and have it altered automatically on the replica (but you can
do it with some manual labour). If you want to replicate a new set of
tables, you can do that easily.
I imagine you've already been flamed to death about the one-schema-per-user
bit so I won't say anything about that.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gera Mel Handumon | 2009-12-08 03:59:55 | pg DATA folder restoration |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-12-07 18:55:35 | Re: Question about replication options |