Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security
Date: 2009-12-07 16:09:59
Message-ID: 20091207160959.GG3552@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner escribió:

> > I'd like to see us be able to support it. One of the things that
> > I think would be worth looking into is whether there is a way to
> > make this pluggable, so that selinux and apparmor and trusted
> > solaris and so on could make use of the same framework
>
> Given the extreme patience and diligence exhibited by KaiGai, I
> hesitate to say this, but it seems to me that this would be
> critically important for the long term success of this feature. I
> have no idea how much work it would be to make the interface to the
> external security system pluggable, but if it's at all feasible, I
> think it should be done.

This is how the code was developed initially -- the patch was called
PGACE and SELinux was but the first implementation on top of it.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-12-07 16:11:32 Re: bug: json format and auto_explain
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-07 16:07:43 Re: bug: json format and auto_explain