From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_attribute.attnum - wrong column ordinal? |
Date: | 2009-12-03 13:42:39 |
Message-ID: | 20091203134239.GB5059@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark escribió:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > My question: can pg_attribute.attnum be used to determine the sequential
> > ordinal positions of columns in a table? What is a right way to get the
> > ordinal numbers?
>
> You could use something like:
>
> row_number() over (partition by T.schemaname,T.viewname order by
> attnum) as "ORDINAL_POSITION"
Should we recast the attributes and columns views in information_schema?
I notice they still use attnum.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-12-03 13:44:32 | Re: Catastrophic changes to PostgreSQL 8.4 |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-12-03 13:41:18 | Re: Catastrophic changes to PostgreSQL 8.4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-12-03 13:44:32 | Re: Catastrophic changes to PostgreSQL 8.4 |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-12-03 13:41:18 | Re: Catastrophic changes to PostgreSQL 8.4 |