Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, hs(at)cybertec(dot)at
Subject: Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication
Date: 2009-11-30 08:14:16
Message-ID: 200911300914.16457.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday 30 November 2009 03:57:11 Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> > we tried to discuss on a lower level what should be needed
> > for a partial replication based on streaming replication.
> We need to discuss a "partial recovery" before the partial replication.
If you do the filtering on the sending side you dont actually need partial
recover in the sense that you filter in the rmgr or similar.

Or do I miss something?

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 张茂森 2009-11-30 08:35:41 is isolation level 'Serializable' in pg not same as 'serializable' in SQL-92?
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2009-11-30 07:45:26 set the cost of an aggregate function