From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Richardson <markmapo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration |
Date: | 2009-11-24 15:44:04 |
Message-ID: | 20091124154404.GA4173@feivel.credativ.lan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:49:33PM -0800, Mark Richardson wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the problem I found is related to this, but I found that ecpg
> doesn't process booleans correctly- this was in a old version of postgres (I
> think it was 7.4.2). I traced it down in the code, and there is a section
> that defines the values to be "yes" or "no", but then further processing
> looks for "true" or "false", so the end result is that a boolean is ALWAYS
> false, because the 2 filters don't match.
Is this a bug that you saw back then in 7 something, or a bug you still see?
> If you're interested in more detail, I have code fixes (they are at work so I'll send on Monday).
Please send them. I'm interested.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2009-11-24 16:07:59 | Re: SE-PgSQL patch review |
Previous Message | Emmanuel Cecchet | 2009-11-24 15:08:33 | Re: Partitioning option for COPY |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raimon Fernandez | 2009-12-17 16:13:20 | Extended Query using the Frontend/Backend Protocol 3.0 |
Previous Message | Mark Richardson | 2009-11-21 20:49:33 | Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration |