| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | AnthonyV <avequeau(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Backup Postgre server |
| Date: | 2009-11-23 12:11:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20091123121153.GE7120@fetter.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 03:19:17AM -0800, AnthonyV wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a pg8.3 server (an 8.4 upgrade is scheduled) on Windows. I
> would like an other pg server in backup in case of hardware problem
> on my first server.
>
> I use read/write queries and I would like the second pg become
> master
This part can be done if you separate the read queries from the ones
that write and/or must be current as of the most recent commit on the
master. Slony works for doing a manual failover.
> without any human intervention.
This part is generally a very bad idea. What happens if there is a
bug in the crash detection system? In broad generality, a sensor
attached directly to an actuator is a booby trap, and this case is no
exception.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Filip Rembiałkowski | 2009-11-23 12:20:32 | Re: Backup Postgre server |
| Previous Message | AnthonyV | 2009-11-23 11:19:17 | Backup Postgre server |