From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bosco Rama <postgres(at)boscorama(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration |
Date: | 2009-11-21 20:18:33 |
Message-ID: | 20091121201833.GA18156@feivel.credativ.lan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 07:02:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Upon poking around in the ecpg sources, I discover that it has its own
> list of "unreserved" keywords and pays no attention whatsoever to the
> core grammar's unreserved_keyword list. I can hardly find words to
> express my dissatisfaction with that. The unreserved_keyword list might
I cannot agree more. Sorry about that, it seems this one got forgotten. I
wasn't aware of this blunder.
Thanks for fixing it Tom.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-11-21 20:26:11 | Re: Hot standby and removing VACUUM FULL |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-11-21 20:18:31 | Re: Proposal: USING clause for DO statement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Richardson | 2009-11-21 20:49:33 | Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-21 00:02:11 | Re: ecpg & 8.3 -> 8.4 migration |