From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql |
Date: | 2009-11-18 04:35:18 |
Message-ID: | 20091118133518.A4A8.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> > I don't want user to check the encoding of scripts before executing --
> > it is far from fail-safe.
>
> That's what we require in all other cases. Why should UTF8 be special?
No. I didn't think about UTF-8 nor BOM in that point.
I assumed we are discussing the following line:
> > I'd say we can always throw an error when we find queries that contain
> > multi-byte characters if no prior encoding declaration.
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2009-11-18 04:36:17 | Re: Syntax for partitioning |
Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2009-11-18 04:24:51 | Re: Syntax for partitioning |