| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: next CommitFest |
| Date: | 2009-11-13 22:10:26 |
| Message-ID: | 200911132310.27076.andres@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 13 November 2009 18:56:01 Greg Smith wrote:
> Take a look at
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=4 right
> now. I've been suggesting to people that they assign themselves to the
> patches they like, and it's nearing completely populated two days before
> the CommitFest has even started. I have 6 reviewers that haven't been
> assigned anything yet and there are only 8 unassigned patches out
> there. In several cases, assigning the reviewer turned out to be quite
> easy because so many submitters joined in--just assign someone who
> submitted a patch in the same area.
I have to admit that at least for me personally its way much easer to get
started on a patch one finds interesting than when not - especially if the
reviewing time slot is after a 10-12h workday or such. To the point where
starting to review a personally "boring" patch takes more time than the review
would have taken itself.
Embarassed,
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-11-13 22:16:15 | Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-11-13 22:05:00 | Re: next CommitFest |