| From: | David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Postgres Clustering Options |
| Date: | 2009-11-11 17:28:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20091111172836.GA24289@mr-paradox.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I'm trying to meet a very high uptime requirement in a high performance environment.
to do this we will need to have some form of cluster for our databases
What I plan on doing is:
Postgres installed on a Cluster configured in active/passive (both pointing to the same SAN
(If PG or the OS fails we trigger a failover to the passive node)
Log shipping between that cluster and a single PG Instance off site.
Is this a common/reccomended method of handling clusterin with Postgres? google searches
basically point to using a replication based solution, which i don't think would meet my
performance demands.
Does anyone have expereince with this or a similar setup that they could share with me?
Thanks
Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ben Chobot | 2009-11-11 17:35:35 | Re: Postgres Clustering Options |
| Previous Message | informatica | 2009-11-11 16:20:17 | Re: Will PostgreSQL 8.4 allow having different encoding databases on a same PostgreSQL server ? |