Re: Incremental Backups in postgres

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Incremental Backups in postgres
Date: 2009-11-10 21:56:17
Message-ID: 200911101356.17600@hal.medialogik.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tuesday 10 November 2009, akp geek <akpgeek(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> So Is it always good to have the backup using PG_dump instead of PITR or
> a combination of both
>

I like to do both. Ongoing PITR, daily base backups (by updating an rsync
copy), and weekly pg_dumps that in turn go to tape.

PITR gives a very recent restore point in the event of server loss. As
previously mentioned, the full (custom) backups let you restore individual
tables. They're also a lot smaller than base backups + WAL logs.

--
"No animals were harmed in the recording of this episode. We tried but that
damn monkey was just too fast."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-11-10 22:04:55 Re: Editor for sgml files
Previous Message akp geek 2009-11-10 21:49:43 Re: Incremental Backups in postgres