| From: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Absolute value of intervals |
| Date: | 2009-11-02 12:47:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20091102124746.GF5407@samason.me.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:22:00AM +0000, Jasen Betts wrote:
> On 2009-10-27, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 03:25:02PM +0000, Sam Mason wrote:
> >> If the absolute value of an interval was defined to strip out all the
> >> negation signs you'd get the "wrong" answers out.
> >
> > Oops, forgot another reason! For maths to work (n) and (-(-n)) should
> > evaluate to the same value. Inverting all the signs, as negation does,
> > will ensure that these semantics remain.
Hum, I'm not entirely sure what I was thinking when I wrote the above.
it's got nothing to do with taking absolute values!
> There not requrement in mathematics that
>
> z be a member of the set { abs(z) , -abs(z) }
>
> consider the case of z=sqrt(-1)
That said, I don't follow your point at all.
--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-11-02 13:00:37 | Re: Absolute value of intervals |
| Previous Message | Vasiliy G Tolstov | 2009-11-02 12:34:46 | Re: cidr data type question |