| From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL |
| Date: | 2009-10-30 23:12:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200910310012.09092.guillaume@lelarge.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-general |
Le vendredi 30 octobre 2009 à 23:48:45, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > How is pgAdmin determining the serial type in this case?
>
> Most likely it's looking for the pg_depend entry that shows the sequence
> as being "owned by" the column. However, that's an oversimplification
> of reality. I would imagine that pgAdmin will lie to you in exactly
> the same cases that used to break pg_dump (notably, where someone has
> manually adjusted either the default expression or the sequence...)
>
I've just read this. I wasn't aware of this. Should we suppress this behavior
of pgAdmin?
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Quan Zongliang | 2009-10-31 10:59:48 | import 2009/10/31 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-30 22:48:45 | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE and SERIAL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-10-30 23:32:57 | Re: Rewriting select statements |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-10-30 23:06:39 | Re: pg_start_backup question |