From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost |
Date: | 2009-10-26 23:52:53 |
Message-ID: | 20091026235253.GO8812@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > Still far from convinced on that one. But effective_io_concurrency
> > should be included even in the first pass.
>
> I think a design that is limited to a prespecified set of GUCs is
> broken by definition. It'd be better to make it work like
> ALTER DATABASE SET.
Well, not exactly like ALTER DATABASE SET because those are now stored
in pg_db_role_setting. But a new spcoptions column storing an array of
key/value pairs seems a reasonable way to do it.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2009-10-27 00:20:46 | Re: "toast.fillfactor" is documented but not recognized? |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2009-10-26 23:47:56 | Re: per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost |