From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT |
Date: | 2009-10-26 01:29:36 |
Message-ID: | 20091026012936.GB4736@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:34:28PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> It's not a perfect match to MIT, but it is close. We (-core) are
> already actively working on this issue to find the most appropriate
> way forward.
Legally speaking, what are the issues at hand here?
Apart from the legal part, what other topics does this touch on?
When I go out to do advocacy, it's good for me to know as much as I
can about the issues involved :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | 노홍찬 | 2009-10-26 01:45:25 | Re: a question about relkind of RelationData handed over to heap_update function |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-10-26 00:33:20 | Re: Parsing config files in a directory |