| From: | Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Andale <anders(at)pagiad(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: could not open process token: error code 5 |
| Date: | 2009-10-14 21:24:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200910141424.04698.aklaver@comcast.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 14 October 2009 6:42:39 am Andale wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have an Postgresql 8.2.5 installation on a Windows server 2003 that have
> worked perfectly for our Mediawiki until we tried to update to 8.4. Before
> the update we took a backup, stopped the service and took a copy of the
> entire database catalog. We could not make the 8.4 (installed in a
> different directory) work so we decided to go back to the initial
> installation which remained intact.
>
> Then when we try to start the service it fails and we get the message
> "could not open process token: error code 5" in the event viewer, nothing
> else. Now after googling for some hours and days I am stuck. the Postgres
> user are to start the service and so nothing is changed there either. Even
> though the database files were not changed, we have also copied the entire
> original database back. The installation has been done with the
> "postgresql-8.2-int.msi" package and it has been reapplied with the
> following command, "msiexec /i postgresql-8.2-int.msi REINSTALLMODE=vamus
> REINSTALL=ALL /"
>
> Still no progress.
>
> What to do?
>
> /Anders
Have you tried getting rid of the data directory you copied back, doing an
initdb to create a new fresh data directory and the restoring from the backup?
Just to cover the case where you did not copy everything you needed to when you
made the original copy.
--
Adrian Klaver
aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Landscheidt | 2009-10-14 21:50:12 | Re: Query to find contiguous ranges on a column |
| Previous Message | Alan Hodgson | 2009-10-14 20:27:16 | Re: Partitioned table question |