From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Concurrency testing |
Date: | 2009-10-08 15:36:49 |
Message-ID: | 20091008153649.GD14810@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:28:53AM +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> http://tsung.erlang-projects.org/
> http://tsung.erlang-projects.org/user_manual.html
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2008-12/msg00032.php
It looks like we're talking about two orthogonal projects here:
1. Test situations which require more than one connection, possibly
to different clusters, for example in the cases of Hot Standby and
Streaming Replication. This further divides into event-based and
time-based tests. It's this situation I had in mind when I posted,
and it was inspired by bugs I've seen, the most recent being in
writeable CTEs.
2. Test situations which require *many* connections in order to find
issues caused, in essence, by load.
Tsung seems well-suited to the latter.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-08 15:50:19 | Re: COPY enhancements |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-10-08 15:33:49 | Re: COPY enhancements |