Re: Rejecting weak passwords

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Date: 2009-10-02 22:56:09
Message-ID: 200910022256.n92Mu9009537@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > That said, it would still be good to have something actually *useful*
> > in contrib. A bit more than just comparing userid and password.
> > Perhaps at least being able to set the min length, and the requirement
> > on having >1 "character class"?
>
> +1. There's still the issue of not being able to do much with a
> pre-MD5'd password, though.

Agreed. I am still a little worried that people will think they are
checking for weak passwords when, for MD5, they are not. I am also
worried that people will unknowingly reduce their security (not use MD5)
to allow weak password checking.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brad T. Sliger 2009-10-03 00:34:16 Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output
Previous Message shakahshakah@gmail.com 2009-10-02 22:30:00 8.5 TODO: any info on "Create dump tool for write-ahead logs..." in PITR section (1.4)?