Re: Weird behavior with "sensitive" cursors.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel F <dbf13db(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Weird behavior with "sensitive" cursors.
Date: 2009-10-02 18:01:54
Message-ID: 20091002180153.GG27505@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alvaro Herrera escribió:
>
> This one really works and includes a basic test case. You were right
> that the extra Register was bogus :-( I had to expose CopySnapshot,
> which I still don't like but ... (I could have added an extra
> Unregister somewhere during portal close, but it would have meant making
> everything messier).

Applied (to HEAD and 8.4).

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gerhard Wiesinger 2009-10-02 18:46:02 Re: PostgreSQL reads each 8k block - no larger blocks are used - even on sequential scans
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-02 17:25:28 Re: Vacuumdb Fails: Huge Tuple