| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on |
| Date: | 2009-09-30 18:11:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20090930181110.GI8280@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander escribió:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 18:34, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> ... (and many of the more
> >> significant remaining patches look like they are right up Tom's alley
> >> anyway).
> >
> > FWIW, if left to my own devices I will eventually get to everything
> > except the dblink, ecpg, and encoding/win32 patches. I don't intend
> > to touch any of those because there are other committers better
> > qualified to review them. (I don't actually think we have anybody
> > except Michael who's really familiar with ecpg.)
>
> I can certainly review the win32 encoding patch, but I was rather
> hoping for some comments from others on if we're interested in a win32
> only solution, or if we want something more generic. Should we just go
> with the win32-only one for now?
Just a couple of days ago a question came on the spanish list because
someone was getting mixed UTF8 and Latin1 output in a log file. This
was in Fedora IIRC, so maybe we do want something more general.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-30 18:16:36 | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-09-30 18:08:34 | Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on |