From: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bryan Montgomery <monty(at)english(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Looking for way to replicate master db to multiple mobile databases |
Date: | 2009-09-24 15:09:26 |
Message-ID: | 200909241709.26291.cedric.villemain@dalibo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Le jeudi 24 septembre 2009, Selena Deckelmann a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Bryan Montgomery <monty(at)english(dot)net>
wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm looking for a way to replicate am master database to multiple (100+)
> > databases that are taken in to the field. Currently for each laptop we
> > dump and load the tables. However,there is only a small percentage of
> > data that changes on a frequent basis.
> >
> > I've been looking around and come across pyerplica, londiste and bucardo
> > - the documentation on most of these is fairly sparse. It seems that
> > Bucardo may be the best bet - at least initially.
>
> Bucardo is a good choice for this usage model because it was
> originally designed to work over a lossy network connections.
yes, but isn't bucardo designed to 2 nodes only ?
>
> You could issue 'kicks' for each laptop sync when you know for sure
> that a laptop has got an active network connection to your master.
> It's also pretty efficient with updates, only copying the current row
> (that's changed) a single time, rather than multiple times if there
> have been multiple changes to that row since the last time a sync
> occurred.
>
> -selena
>
--
----
Cédric Villemain
Administrateur de Base de Données
Cel: +33 (0)6 74 15 56 53
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua Tolley | 2009-09-24 15:27:33 | Re: Looking for way to replicate master db to multiple mobile databases |
Previous Message | sheepjxx | 2009-09-24 14:48:44 | What is the difference of these two kinds of foreign key defination? |