| From: | Dan Colish <dan(at)unencrypted(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: generic copy options |
| Date: | 2009-09-18 17:39:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20090918173955.GD14690@funkstrom.spiretech.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:31:21AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > Nope, but it was on the checklist and I was being thorough.
>
> That's a good thing. I was just seeing if I needed to get involved in
> performance testing.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
> www.pgexperts.com
I always say, the more tests the better. From the tests I ran it was
clear the parser did not change speed. Might be good to have someone
confirm that.
--
Dan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-18 17:48:02 | Re: updated join removal patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-09-18 17:39:28 | Re: Schedule for 8.5 Development |