From: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak |
Date: | 2009-09-14 15:58:50 |
Message-ID: | 20090914155850.GY5407@samason.me.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:54:07AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> wrote:
> > the deeper problem seems to be that the table was created as:
> >
> > create table test (a tstdom);
> >
> > and not as:
> >
> > create table test (a tstdom not null);
>
> Given that tstdom is declared as NOT NULL, is this difference
> considered a *feature* or is it an implementation quirk?
That's why I pointed it out!
Based on my reading of the SQL spec (and reading about Codd's
descriptions of domains) I'd say it was a bug/implementation quirk.
--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-14 16:28:24 | Re: ERROR: invalid page header in block 502758 of relation base/16388/16403 |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-09-14 15:54:07 | Re: BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-09-14 16:05:24 | Re: Streaming Replication patch for CommitFest 2009-09 |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-09-14 15:56:56 | Re: [PATCH] 8.5 plpgsql change for named notation: treat word following AS keyword as label v3 |