Re: autovacuum_max_workers docs

From: Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autovacuum_max_workers docs
Date: 2009-09-14 00:11:56
Message-ID: 20090914001156.GJ4687@eddie
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:54:21PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2009-09-11 at 07:39 -0600, Joshua Tolley wrote:
> While your discovery is accurate and the change makes it consistent with
> other similar parameters, note that the previous wording is also
> completely correct. This while way of phrasing things is suboptimal.
>
> I've committed it anyway for now.

Although I understand we also need a way to demonstrate which options can be
set interactively, and which can't, I'd love to see "changing this option
requires a restart" or "... a reload", if only because I'm always interpreting
the docs wrong in that respect. That said, if I ever come up with woeding I'm
especially proud of, I'll submit a less-trivial patch.

--
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
http://www.endpoint.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2009-09-14 00:16:01 Re: Why does LOG have higher priority than ERROR and WARNING?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-13 22:25:46 Re: Rough draft: easier translation of psql help