From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: COPY enhancements |
Date: | 2009-09-11 20:56:11 |
Message-ID: | 20090911205611.GN17756@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Postgres has a hstore data type which seems well suited for passing
>>> key/value option pairs...
>
> Quite apart from any other reason, it is not builtin, so there is no way
> that any builtin thing can use it.
Clearly, that's fixable.. I think it's an interesting concept, but I
don't know that I'd advocate it (using hstore for this in some way).
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-11 21:07:15 | Re: COPY enhancements |
Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-09-11 20:35:33 | Re: drop tablespace error: invalid argument |