Re: CTE bug?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CTE bug?
Date: 2009-09-09 19:16:38
Message-ID: 20090909191638.GB8540@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:00:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > Should the outer query be able to reference further-in CTEs?
>
> No, why would you expect that?

No particular reason, I suppose. I'm not clear on what the standard
says about this.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-09 19:23:52 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-09-09 19:10:53 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types