From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch: update Bonjour support to the newer non-deprecated API |
Date: | 2009-09-08 16:13:23 |
Message-ID: | 20090908161323.GE549@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Should we inject some sort of compile-time rejection of the
> > compatibility API? Like, say
>
> > #ifdef AVAHI_SERVICE_COOKIE
> > #error The Avahi implementation is incompatible
> > #endif
>
> > inside some #ifdef BONJOUR block?
>
> I looked into this and couldn't find any obvious candidate symbol to
> test for. I'm not that excited about throwing roadblocks in the way
> of somebody who wants to try it, anyway --- my feeling is more like
> "if it breaks you get to keep both pieces".
Agreed -- that seems reasonable considering that one needs to
explicitely pass --enable-bonjour anyway.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-09-08 16:19:39 | Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-08 16:12:10 | RfD: more powerful "any" types |