Re: Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet

From: Kristian Larsson <kristian(at)spritelink(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet
Date: 2009-09-08 15:49:02
Message-ID: 20090908154901.GM47859@spritelink.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:06:36AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Kristian Larsson wrote:
>
> > And poking in pg_operator / pg_type seems to confirm this:
> >
> > nils=# SELECT (SELECT typname FROM pg_type WHERE typelem=oprleft), oprname, (SELECT typname FROM pg_type WHERE typelem=oprright) FROM pg_operator WHERE oprleft=(SELECT typelem FROM pg_type WHERE typname='_inet') AND oprname='+';
> > ?column? | oprname | ?column?
> > ----------+---------+----------
> > _inet | + | _int8
> > (1 row)
>
> That query is wrong -- type _inet is actually another way to spell
> inet[]. What you want is this, that also confirms your problem:

Sorry, I'm not intimately familiar with pg_operator ..

> > Am I doing it the wrong way? Bug?
>
> I'd say this is just a missing feature.

Would pgsql-bugs@ be the appropriate forum for a feature request?

I looked through the FAQ and Todo on the wiki and could not find
any already existing items to fix or not fix this.

Kind regards,
Kristian.

--
Kristian Larsson KLL-RIPE
+46 704 264511 kll(at)spritelink(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-09-08 15:53:58 Re: Order By Date Question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-08 15:37:02 Re: Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-08 15:50:01 Re: Patch: update Bonjour support to the newer non-deprecated API
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-08 15:37:02 Re: Adding integers ( > 8 bytes) to an inet