Re: gcc versus division-by-zero traps

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: gcc versus division-by-zero traps
Date: 2009-09-03 17:50:03
Message-ID: 20090903175003.GU8410@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 01:26:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 10:24:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> While s390x is still not quite mainstream, at least I can get
> >> access to one ;-).
>
> > Do you also have access to z/OS with Unix System Services?
>
> No, Red Hat's machines run RHEL ;-)

I'm given to understand it's possible to run both on the same
hardware.

Cheers,
David
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Webb Sprague 2009-09-03 17:54:57 Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest Code Sprint with PUGs
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-09-03 17:46:37 Re: community decision-making & 8.5