From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Adding \ev view editor? |
Date: | 2009-09-01 19:03:43 |
Message-ID: | 20090901190343.GW20482@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:41:31AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> I've grown to adore the new \ef function editor.
>
> It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to add a view editor as
> \ev. While editors would also be good for other objects, I don't think
> we can do \et or \er etc. because those objects don't support CREATE OR
> REPLACE.
>
> Opinions? Other objects which could take \e?
For objects that don't take CREATE OR REPLACE, \e could include the
object definition at the top in a multi-line comment, then start with
ALTER [OBJECT]
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-01 19:11:45 | Re: \d+ for long view definitions? |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-09-01 19:01:10 | Re: \d+ for long view definitions? |