From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | bilal ghayyad <bilmar_gh(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: $Body$ |
Date: | 2009-08-30 23:22:09 |
Message-ID: | 20090830232209.GJ20482@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 04:13:18PM -0700, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> This is the idea david:
>
> Why in the constant string we use the tag and we do not use the tag
> in the BODY?
>
> In other wrods, why we write it $BODY$ and does not write it as
> $q$BODY$q$ or as $$BODY$$?
The string BODY in $BODY$ has no syntactical significance. You could
just as easily use $$ or $supercalifragilisticexpialidocious$. The
only place where the string inside matters is when you're nesting
dollar quoted structures.
> Also why in the single-quote syntax, each backslash will be written
> as four backslashes? While this will not be needed in the
> dolar-quoted string?
Dollar quoting was specifically invented so that people would not have
to use torrents of backslashes and/or single quotes.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bilal ghayyad | 2009-08-31 01:56:59 | Query and the number of row result |
Previous Message | bilal ghayyad | 2009-08-30 23:13:18 | Re: $Body$ |