Re: DB Design Advice

From: "stoneg64(at)excite(dot)com" <stoneg64(at)excite(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org,pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com
Subject: Re: DB Design Advice
Date: 2009-08-21 05:58:16
Message-ID: 20090821015816.24576@web011.roc2.bluetie.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>stoneg64(at)excite(dot)com wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> My company is designing a database in which we intend to store data
>> for several customers. We are trying to decide if,
>>
>> A: we want to store all customer data in one set of tables with
>> customer_id fields separating the data or,
>> B: storing each customers data in a separate schema.
>>
>> I'd like to get some opinions on the pros and cons of these methods
>> concerning maintainability, scalability, and performance.
>
>MHO, that would depend on what this data is and how you use it.

Yeah, I figured you might say that.

>Id this your company's data on your business with these customers, like
>AR/AP transactions and so forth? Or is this data you're storing for
>these companies, data thats really 'theirs', and that won't be used
>together, such as their websites that you host ?

I'd say that the data is more 'theirs' then ours. Customers' data shouldn't be used together but we may occasionally compare customer data. I'll also add that each customer should have a fairly significant amount of data.

Thanks again for the help.
Ted

------------------------------------------------------------
Click here for to find products that will help grow your small business.
Small Business Tools
http://tagline.excite.com/fc/FgElN1gzL0niqPjd1mHomvN0Xtfz5dmDbmfxeHGZEqyRy5wuc3qHX737QJa/

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Sergio Borgonovo 2009-08-21 06:25:23 bayesian classification over tsvector
Previous Message Yaroslav Tykhiy 2009-08-21 05:51:48 Re: "Could not open relation XXX: No such file or directory"