Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema

From: daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Date: 2009-08-16 18:29:46
Message-ID: 20090816182946.GB22670@sonic.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:59:53PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2009/8/16 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> > On sön, 2009-08-16 at 00:04 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> SQL is not Lisp. Simple is  good. I didn't think Peter was really very
> >> serious.
> >
> > Well, I don't know if we really need to call it "lambda", but I fully
> > expect to be able to use these "ad hoc functions" as part of other
> > expressions.  So making DO or whatever a top-level command that does not
> > integrate with anything else would not really satisfy me.
>
> +1

+1

-dg

--
David Gould daveg(at)sonic(dot)net 510 536 1443 510 282 0869
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-08-16 19:06:26 Re: Wisconsin benchmark
Previous Message daveg 2009-08-16 18:27:30 Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema