| From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: FDW-based dblink |
| Date: | 2009-08-14 07:20:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20090814160056.9A04.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> In fact, by using 2PC without a recovery system you
> can end up with a transaction that's prepared but never committed or
> aborted, requiring an admin to remove it manually, which is even worse than
> not using 2PC to begin with.
Yes, true. But I think "hard-to-use" is better than "unable-to-do".
If needed, we can develop some recovery systems working with the
dblink together, no?
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2009-08-14 07:51:44 | Re: CommitFest 2009-07: Remaining Patches |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-08-14 06:40:19 | Re: FDW-based dblink |