Re: mail alert

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jasen Betts <jasen(at)xnet(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mail alert
Date: 2009-08-13 21:54:20
Message-ID: 20090813215420.GU5909@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Jasen Betts wrote:
> On 2009-08-12, Jan Verheyden <jan(dot)verheyden(at)uz(dot)kuleuven(dot)ac(dot)be> wrote:
> > --_000_E30C7040DE22624185BAD4093190B54437BE5DB4A9EX2007MBX2uzk_
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > It's on Windows
> >
>
> I'd go with notify and a listener written in C using c-client to send
> emails, but only because I've used those before.

I wouldn't write it in C but rather Perl or Python, but whatever suits
your fancy should work (Visual Basic anyone?). The advantages to using
a listener program instead of doing it in a trigger or something like
that are:

- transaction semantics are kept; you don't send an email only to find
out your transaction has been rolled back for whatever reason, and then
send a second email when the transaction is replayed

- you don't block the database system just because your mail server is
down

- the email can be sent on whatever schedule fits the listener program

- the listener client can run elsewhere, not only in the database server

- any further external processing can take place at that time, without
bothering the database server

- other stuff I don't recall ATM

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Landscheidt 2009-08-13 22:24:07 Re: mail alert
Previous Message Relyea, Mike 2009-08-13 20:46:31 Re: simple? query