Re: "Hot standby"?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Hot standby"?
Date: 2009-08-11 12:32:20
Message-ID: 200908111232.n7BCWKg11862@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > What is "hot" and "standby" about the proposed "hot standby" feature?

OK, so it is "warm slave".

> Absolutely nothing. It's horribly misnamed.
>
> I have also long argued that "Synchronous Replication" should really
> be called "Streaming Replication". Perhaps it may eventually support
> a synchronous mode of operation, but that will probably never be the
> only one.

Yes, I like "streaming replication" because no matter how we implement
this feature, there are going to be synchronous and asynchronous modes
eventually.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-08-11 12:37:42 HEAD docs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-08-11 12:17:44 TODO list, was Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format