| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: machine-readable explain output v4 |
| Date: | 2009-08-10 12:42:43 |
| Message-ID: | 200908101442.44971.andres@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday 10 August 2009 14:39:22 Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > I produced/mailed a relaxng version for a a bit older version and I plan
> > to refresh and document it once the format seems suitably stable. I am
> > not sure it is yet. If yes, this should not take that long...
> > (Relaxng because you easily can convert it into most other XML schema
> > description languages)
> I don't mind doing both, but I think one should be authoritative, and
> whatever the relative technical merits are (please, let's not debate
> that here) the fact after quite some years is that XML Schemas have much
> more traction. See the thread that starts at
> <http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200804/msg00058.html>. For
> example, Xerces-J supports XML Schemas natively.
I don't really mind which format gets choosen - I just had relaxng one
already done.
Do you plan to write a XML-Schema Schema? Just to avoid duplicated work...
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-08-10 13:00:45 | Re: machine-readable explain output v4 |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-08-10 12:39:22 | Re: machine-readable explain output v4 |