From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use DocBook XSL stylesheets for man page building This switches |
Date: | 2009-08-05 19:34:45 |
Message-ID: | 20090805193445.GJ6518@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> petere(at)postgresql(dot)org (Peter Eisentraut) writes:
> > Use DocBook XSL stylesheets for man page building
>
> I tried "make man" on my Fedora 10 machine. It built stuff, but:
>
> * I see it claiming to be making manpages for the SPI functions and
> dblink functions, eg
>
> Note: meta manvol : no refentry/refmeta/manvolnum dblink_connect
> Note: meta manvol : see http://docbook.sf.net/el/manvolnum dblink_connect
> Note: Writing man1/dblink_connect.1
>
> but no output file actually appears. And why is it dropping this stuff
> in section 1, wouldn't 3 be more appropriate?
Committed -- the dblink pages are still the same though.
The reason the files they don't show up is that they are being
removed by a "rm" call in the makefile. And they are in section 1
because they are missing a <manvolnum> tag.
The SPI pages could use some SEE ALSO entries, but I ran out of time
halfway through writing that. Maybe later.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | User Bmomjian | 2009-08-06 03:27:38 | pg-migrator - pg_migrator: Properly error out for arrays, composites, |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-08-05 19:31:50 | pgsql: Fix manpages related to SPI functions. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-06 10:20:17 | Re: "make install" in doc/ |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-08-05 19:17:03 | "make install" in doc/ |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-08-05 19:38:13 | Re: the case for machine-readable error fields |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-05 19:29:52 | Re: the case for machine-readable error fields |