From: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ? |
Date: | 2009-08-05 13:15:18 |
Message-ID: | 20090805131518.GN5407@samason.me.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 08:02:13AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Paul Taylor <paul_t100(at)fastmail(dot)fm>:
> > this
> > is an opensource project and to enable others to contribute easily it is
> > much easier if they can download the code and run mvn package to compile
> > and test. Once you start introducing external database setups, and
> > database configs things can easily start going wrong, and you can't
> > share databases when doing automated testing
>
> Gonna have to disagree yet again.
Yup, I'm wondering about it as well. Surely if it's an open source
project, people are going to have a database setup to run the thing with
anyway--if only to test it?
For build/test farms it's going to make it a bit more complex yes, but
wouldn't it be easier to configure each machine separately (or write a
set of scripts to do the common setup if you have 20+ test boxes!) than
to bake in a large set of assumptions into your test scripts?
--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Taylor | 2009-08-05 13:45:20 | Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ? |
Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2009-08-05 12:56:47 | Re: Update Query doesn't affect all records |