| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | ijabz(at)fastmail(dot)fm |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ? |
| Date: | 2009-08-04 13:56:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20090804095627.0006843a.wmoran@potentialtech.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
In response to Paul Taylor <ijabz(at)fastmail(dot)fm>:
> Sam Mason wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:37:34PM +0100, Paul Taylor wrote:
> >
> >> Does postgres have an embedded mode to allow a database to be embedded
> >> with Java application without requiring seperate db manager, like the
> >> derby database does ?
> >
> > No, and I think the consensus is that this would be bad. See:
> >
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/FAQ#Can_PostgreSQL_be_embedded.3F
>
> Thats a shame, I wanted to write junit test for a java program that
> queried a database, requiring a full database to be available for unit
> tests is not really an environment I want to have.
Has it occurred to you that testing a DB client when there's no
DB isn't really a very accurate or realistic test?
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-08-04 14:01:58 | Re: parameters in functions and overlap with names of columns |
| Previous Message | Paul Taylor | 2009-08-04 13:48:39 | Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ? |