Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ?

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: ijabz(at)fastmail(dot)fm
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ?
Date: 2009-08-04 13:56:27
Message-ID: 20090804095627.0006843a.wmoran@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In response to Paul Taylor <ijabz(at)fastmail(dot)fm>:

> Sam Mason wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:37:34PM +0100, Paul Taylor wrote:
> >
> >> Does postgres have an embedded mode to allow a database to be embedded
> >> with Java application without requiring seperate db manager, like the
> >> derby database does ?
> >
> > No, and I think the consensus is that this would be bad. See:
> >
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/FAQ#Can_PostgreSQL_be_embedded.3F
>
> Thats a shame, I wanted to write junit test for a java program that
> queried a database, requiring a full database to be available for unit
> tests is not really an environment I want to have.

Has it occurred to you that testing a DB client when there's no
DB isn't really a very accurate or realistic test?

--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-08-04 14:01:58 Re: parameters in functions and overlap with names of columns
Previous Message Paul Taylor 2009-08-04 13:48:39 Re: Does derby have an embedded Mode like Derby ?