Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: xpath not a good replacement for xpath_string
Date: 2009-07-29 10:12:36
Message-ID: 200907291312.36924.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 28 July 2009 23:30:23 pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
> The thing that perplexed me was that it was not obvious from the docs how,
> exactly, to get the functionality that was simple and straight forward in
> XML2.

I continue to be in favor of adding

xpath_string
xpath_number
xpath_boolean

functions, which would be both easier to use and provide a more casting-free
approach to pass the data around. In the past there were some doubts and
objections about that, but I think it could be done.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2009-07-29 10:22:04 Revised signal multiplexer patch
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2009-07-29 09:46:29 Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format