From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgpool-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, Leonardo Carvalho <leonardotcarvalho(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Kostas P(dot)" <kostas(at)nsoft(dot)lt> |
Subject: | Re: [Pgpool-general] backend mismatch |
Date: | 2009-07-21 08:20:51 |
Message-ID: | 200907211020.51437.guillaume@lelarge.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 10:12:37, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Guillaume
>
> Lelarge<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 19:06:50, Dave Page a écrit :
> >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Guillaume
> >>
> >> Lelarge<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> >> > The latter. I don't see a way to catch them all easily. I'll commit
> >> > this, and try to find a way to catch the others.
> >>
> >> Good luck with that. We use multi-sentence statements in practically
> >> every SQL dialogue to group together commands like "CREATE xxx; ALTER
> >> xxx; COMMENT ON xxx;" to run everything as one transaction without
> >> explicitly starting or ending one. Changing that would require some
> >> fairly invasive changes.
> >
> > Hmmmm. You're right. I don't know why I didn't think about this. Should I
> > revert my patch? it doesn't do any good (and no bad AFAICT).
>
> The downside is an extra roundtrip. If it doesn't help, let's back it out.
OK, I will do.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | svn | 2009-07-21 08:38:19 | SVN Commit by dpage: r7977 - in trunk/pgadmin3: . pgadmin/schema |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-07-21 08:20:30 | Re: Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin3 Version 1.10.0 : Crash when configuring an pgAgent job |