Re: SE-PostgreSQL?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SE-PostgreSQL?
Date: 2009-07-18 16:31:34
Message-ID: 200907181831.34551.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday 18 July 2009 18:06:00 David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> At this point, SE-PostgreSQL has taken up a *lot* of community
> resources, not to mention an enormous and doubtless frustrating amount
> of Kohei-san's time and effort, thus far without a single committed
> patch, or even a consensus as to what it should (or could) do.
>
> Rather than continuing to blunder into the future, I think we need to
> do a reality check in the form of a couple of questions:
>
> 1. Among the committers who could maintain the features, whatever
> they turn out to be, who is actually volunteering to do so?

> 2. Apart from Kohei-san and Stephen Frost, is anybody actually
> interested in having this feature at all?
I would definitely be interested.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Pedersen 2009-07-18 16:44:59 Re: SE-PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2009-07-18 16:19:05 Re: GEQO vs join order restrictions