From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SE-PostgreSQL? |
Date: | 2009-07-18 16:31:34 |
Message-ID: | 200907181831.34551.andres@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Saturday 18 July 2009 18:06:00 David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> At this point, SE-PostgreSQL has taken up a *lot* of community
> resources, not to mention an enormous and doubtless frustrating amount
> of Kohei-san's time and effort, thus far without a single committed
> patch, or even a consensus as to what it should (or could) do.
>
> Rather than continuing to blunder into the future, I think we need to
> do a reality check in the form of a couple of questions:
>
> 1. Among the committers who could maintain the features, whatever
> they turn out to be, who is actually volunteering to do so?
> 2. Apart from Kohei-san and Stephen Frost, is anybody actually
> interested in having this feature at all?
I would definitely be interested.
Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2009-07-18 16:44:59 | Re: SE-PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2009-07-18 16:19:05 | Re: GEQO vs join order restrictions |